I noted a pickup truck with a tonneau cover consisting of a solar panel and wondered about its practicality. Neither the Via Vtrux pickup (a series PHEV) nor the SolTrux panel option are in production, which is anticipated for 2014. It's a nice looking truck.
But is the solar panel practical? I have a Jeep pickup into which I've installed a 32 gallon water tank and other items designed to let me be self-sustaining in the Mojave, Sonoran, and Great Basin deserts of the Southwest. Where better to capture the sun?
So what are the appropriate numbers? We'd like to have battery capacity, dimensions and efficiency of the solar panels, and the claimed output. Here we find that the battery pack is 22 kWh. The dimensions of the panel array aren't given. but the standard bed is 78.7" long. The width isn't given but might be 65". The larger panel is stated to be 800 watts.
I see here that, in March (about average) I can expect on the order of 5 kWh/(m^-2*day) (kilowatt hours per square meter per day) for a panel mounted horizontally as it would be on a tonneau cover or roof rack. If I assume that the panels are 72" X 60", or 2.8 m^2 they should intercept 2.8*5 14 kWh per day. At 20% efficiency, I should get (surprise) 2.8 kWh/day. Assuming that I'd never let the battery pack below 20% charge, it would take 17.6/2.8 or a bit over 6 days to fully charge the battery. And the 22 kWh is represented to be good for 35 miles (though my desert miles are VERY hard on energy use). At that ratio, a day's worth of sunshine would take me (2.8/17.6)*35 or about 6 miles and probably a lot less in the rugged terrain where I'd be operating.
I suppose that, were I (through incredible stupidity or possibly a punctured fuel tank) out of gas and stranded, I could drive six miles per day for however many days it took to get to civilization (a very long way from the places I go). The fact of the matter is that it simply takes a lot of square meters to provide significant power. Verdict? NOT worth the estimated $3,000 price for the panels.
Update: Here's a clickable link to the article cited in the comments by Anonymous.
Update: Here's a clickable link to the article cited in the comments by Anonymous.
8 comments:
I think this vehicle falls in category of greenwashing ... and the solar panel cover is just a tiny part of it, please see http://evobsession.com/via-motors-vtrux-gets-solar-tonneau-option-many-questions/
If this design is the proper solution then I wonder what the problem is!! Before anybody tries to electrify such a truck, first figure out why they need such a heavy vehicle. It will be much more efficient to start with a lighter vehicle.
I cannot see how somebody can keep a straight face and say this vehicle is a serious attempt to conserve natural resources. It may be an interesting research project, but it is not a viable product.
There might conceivably be a few use cases where this is the perfect solution, but I cannot think of any.
Efforts like these are distractions that do not move us any closer toward sustainable or efficient transportation.
Anonymous,
Yes, it should be a candidate for my Greenwashing Hall of Fame. I'm going to actually start that. Perhaps award categories could be Advertisements, Products, and...
I read your post and i appreciate your efforts. The information that you share in the above article is very nice and useful .All the things that you share with people, are very nice. Thanks for this article
Nice detailing story inside it.
thanks for shared
I think this is a great idea. Having solar panels on a truck bed like this will help save on gas. Using less gas will help save the environment as well. All in all I think putting solar panels on a truck is a brilliant idea. Thanks for the great article. http://www.btryan.com.au/panel_beating.html
Post a Comment