tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26744483.post7009319408713617207..comments2023-12-30T19:42:59.088-08:00Comments on Adventures in Fuel Economy, Energy Use, Physics, and Life: Jumping the shark*King of the Roadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06841601144107400103noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26744483.post-37439869513563537942014-07-14T18:02:04.568-07:002014-07-14T18:02:04.568-07:00Unlike you, I haven't been resetting the milea...Unlike you, I haven't been resetting the mileage efficiency indicator after each fill-up. So, I'm missing those data. The indicated total average mpg is 40.2, however, my calculations return 38 mpg. <br />Verifying the odometer mileage with gps mileage was a very good idea.Arezoonoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26744483.post-15463459050219651192014-07-12T13:39:02.757-07:002014-07-12T13:39:02.757-07:00Hi Arezoo, I'd read about that elsewhere and i...Hi Arezoo, I'd read about that elsewhere and intend to publish a post about it. In general, it won't be favorable<br /><br />As far as the milage indication vs. actual data, I actually posted about that back in 2012, <a href="http://hamiltonianfunction.blogspot.com/2012/10/indicated-gas-mileage.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>. In my previous vehicle and the ct200h, it's been the case that actual milage calculated by miles driven and gallons used is lower than the indication on the screen. I've even gone so far as to verify odometer mileage with gps mileage, thinking that, perhaps, the odometer records too little mileage. No such error was found though. In short, I have no explanation.King of the Roadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06841601144107400103noreply@blogger.com